Blog

5G spectrum clubs and “open trials”: does free mean freeloading?

Millimetre wave spectrum not only promises to deliver faster speeds, greater bandwidth and lower latency, but its restricted propagation means it may come with a whole new range of licensing models. France, for example, is offering temporary licences in the 26 GHz band to companies willing to allow third parties access their infrastructure. In return these “open 5G trial platforms” will be granted a three-year licence under a temporarily relaxed regulatory…
| Manuel R. Marti
Millimetre wave spectrum not only promises to deliver faster speeds, greater bandwidth and lower latency, but its restricted propagation means it may come with a whole new range of licensing models. France, for example, is offering temporary licences in the 26 GHz band to companies willing to allow third parties access their infrastructure. In return these “open 5G trial platforms” will be granted a three-year licence under a temporarily relaxed regulatory framework. The regulator is hoping operators will collaborate with vertical customers to increase understanding of the technology and test business models. When we asked Arcep whether this meant mandatory access at no cost and the answer was clear: nothing has yet been decided. But if verticals can use infrastructure free of charge won't that discourage mobile operators and neutral hosts from setting up these trial networks? On the other hand, do industries and startups have the skills or funding to set up their own networks? Elsewhere in Europe, Denmark is mulling network sharing in 5G pioneer bands, including mmWave spectrum. Italy, which became the first country to auction the 26 GHz band, is proposing a 'club licensing' model. Under this approach, licensees (mobile carriers) will be able to share any unused spectrum from the other licensees, improving their offering at no extra cost. Similarly, three US academics have also suggested  their regulator establish a mmWave spectrum access club. They claim it would be an ideal middle-ground between exclusively licensed and unlicensed spectrum access regimes. It is far too early to tell which option is more likely to work better in practice, but regulatory bodies are certainly exploring new ground.

Blog

By | Manuel R. Marti
Born in Spain, made in the world || Journalism and International Relations graduate || Former Gambling Insider & La Voz de Galicia || Stereotypical food enthusiast
Img Alt

Newsletter

Discover why hundreds of regulators and technology companies use our services

SUBSCRIBE
Comments
UK mobile operators warn of Vodafone/Three spectrum dominance
Update (March 22, 2024): The CMA has..." by Richard Haas
Mar 22, 2024
Telefónica criticises EU Orange/MásMóvil merger decision
The Spanish government approved the..." by Mirva Villa
Mar 13, 2024
Exclusive: Director of the ITU Radiocommunication Bureau on WRC-23 
Noted and amended. Many thanks Nikolai." by Laura Sear
Mar 13, 2024
Exclusive: Director of the ITU Radiocommunication Bureau on WRC-23 
Not everyone knows that NOW4WRC23..." by Nikolai Shienok
Mar 13, 2024
Regulators should prioritise social welfare, not infrastructure targets
Richard, thanks for amending the text...." by Nikolai Shienok
Feb 16, 2024